Because near the optimum speed the COT function is very shallow, these changes in speed result in a small change in COT (0.5%). On rough terrain, the preferred speed (1.07☐.05 m s −1) was significantly slower than the COT minimum speed (1.13☐.07 m s −1 P=0.02). On the smooth surface, the preferred speed (1.24☐.17 m s −1) was not found to be statistically different ( P=0.09) than the speed that minimized COT (1.34☐.03 m s −1). The COT–speed relationships were similarly U-shaped for both surfaces, but the COT values on rough terrain were approximately 115% greater. In both locations, subjects performed five to seven trials at different speeds relative to their preferred speed. Ten healthy men walked on both a straight, flat, smooth floor and an outdoor trail strewn with rocks and boulders. Rough terrain presumably introduces other factors, such as stability, to the objective function. To test this idea, we compared the preferred speeds and the relationships between COT and speed for people walking on both a smooth, level floor and a rough, natural terrain trail. We hypothesized that the objective function for walking is more complex than only minimizing the COT. However, these studies were mostly performed on smooth, level ground or on treadmills. This has been found in a variety of population groups and other species. Further, humans prefer to walk at speeds that approximately minimize their metabolic energy expenditure per unit distance (i.e. Humans have evolved the ability to walk very efficiently.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |